I always cringe when I hear these words from a client:

  • “I don’t need SEO, my developer took care of it (or is taking care of it).
  • I don’t need SEO, my designer did that (or is doing that).

In almost all cases, I’ve already checked the site, and it’s not anywhere near optimized for search engines. This tells me either that:

  • The client just ASSUMED the designer/developer took care of it.
  • The developer/designer TOLD the client that he or she had taken care of SEO. In some cases, maybe he or she charged extra for that “work”.

Well you know what? It’s a load of crap. The site hasn’t been touched. All the titles and descriptions are the same. There are no alt attributes (unless they say “click here” or “sign up”).

Of course the other version of this story is where the designer or developer says, “I’m working on it and will have it for you in a day or two.” Well you know what? That turns out to be crap too, when I check months later and everything’s just the way it was when I brought it to the client’s attention. I could have taken care of this in nothing flat, but the client has already placed extreme faith (misplaced, at that) in their developer or designer who has just fed them a line.

Hey, if you don’t know what you’re doing, find someone who does and stop screwing your clients over! These are good people to work with – stop taking advantage and be honest, will ya?

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

This post, by Rand Fishkin over at SEOmoz looks at how the latest deal between Microsoft and Yahoo could change the SEO landscape for those of us who practice search engine optimization.

Essentially, Microsoft and Yahoo have entered into a 10 year agreement (that is still subject to approval and could take as long as two years to implement) that, among other things, provides that Microsoft’s new Bing search platform will be the exclusive algorithmic search and paid search platform for Yahoo! sites.

At this point, much of the conversation is speculation, but some of it well-founded. In its brief life thus far, I can’t say that I’m especially fond of Bing. In any event, it will mean that targeting “the big 3″ of search will eventually become targeting “the big 2″.

Both Microsoft and Yahoo have quite a long way to go to match Google’s Webmaster Tools and hopefully the outcome will mean that better tools will be available in the future on “BingHoo”.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 0 comments }

The folks over at SEOmoz have released their latest set of SEO best practices, which is a compilation based on their testing data and observations.

If you’re not already familiar with SEOmoz, it’s a great place to cut your teeth on learning SEO as well as a trustworthy resource for staying up to date on SEO, which isn’t always easy to do.

Two findings struck a chord with me. One, their testing seems to have confirmed my suspicions I blogged about a few months back that Yahoo does place some weight on the content of the META keywords tag. Even though Yahoo is a relatively small percentage of the search engine market, I don’t think most sites can take the luxury of ignoring them.

The other finding was that placing keywords in H1 tags seems to have less value than it used to. Of course, it’s still another occurrence of your keywords on the page, but placing it in an H1 now seems to be of primary benefit to your readers, since doing so can help create a hierarchy of your content on the page. Of course, various styles defined in a cascading style sheet (CSS) can do the same thing, and it’s always a good idea to give readers visual cues on where they are within a document or blog post.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 1 comment }

I recently had the displeasure of learning that one of my .edu client’s websites had been hijacked by Viagra/Cialis/Levitra spammers. An alert to the University’s IT department received quick attention and response.

How the Hijacking Became Apparent

I make it a habit to periodically check my cilents’ sites in Google Webmaster Tools. Lo and behold, wouldn’t you know it – some of the seach queries that were most frequently used for the client’s site to come up in search were:

  • order viagra online
  • viagra online without prescription
  • buy levitra

You get the idea. Searching for “order viagra online” revealed the following SERP in Google (I’ve circled some of the many phony results and in most cases identified who controls the legitimate domain):

Google Search Engine Results for Hijacked Websites

Why Sites Were Targets

Obviously, the great majority of the sites have strong domain authority. Of course, if spammers can get their pages on a domain with this kind of authority, their chances of ranking well, they’ll likely get listed much farther up in the SERPs. But is it really necessary?

There were only 5.9 million results in Google when I conducted the search. While some may think that’s very competitive, it’s not, really. But as hard as it is to get links these days, I suppose it’s much easier and faster to get rankings this way than by using “traditional” website promotion methods.

The Problem with Doing This

Besides the fact that it’s just flat out wrong to do this, other problems arise. What organization that has a legitimate purpose would in any way want to be associated with a Canadian pharmacy out to sell ED drugs illegally? Especially when you consider who’s on the list – like the University of Kentucky, Missouri, Penn State, Southern Illinois and other education institutions as well as other finely regarded sites, such as the Washington Sculptors Group and the International Alliance of Women.

How the Domain Hijack Took Place

I’m not about to provide enough details to allow the practice of domain hijacking to spread. Suffice it to say, that a directory was found on which permissions were set so that the world could write to the directory. Rogue .htaccess files were created on the client’s server that would redirect every request to an index.php file with binary code that when decoded grabbed content off a remote web server and constructed its own set of pages. My first tip off came when I found the world-writeable directory and alerted the client.

In this client’s case, entry was made through a blog directory. Several of the results in the sample SERPs show typical blog URLs – others show index.php files, so it looks like similar vulnerabilities on these servers were used to hijack the domains.

Do They Even Know?

I suppose the scary thing is that most of the hijacked sites don’t even know this is going on. Unless an IT person, a faculty member or someone else associated with the hijacked domain, ends up searching for Viagra and happens to see their site listed, most of this goes unnoticed and uncorrected for substantial periods of time.

Certainly this is not a new technique. It’s been going on for quite some time. I can only hope more and more people will discover it and shut these people down. Of course, more will jump up into their place. I’ve alerted Google to the crappy, hijacked search results and I’m putting out the word – I don’t know what else I can do, but I’d like to see it stop.

Lessons Learned: A Couple of Warning Signals

What did I learn from this? To watch out for a few warning signals that domain hijacking is taking place. For this specific type of attack, to watch for directories that are writeable to the world and to watch for binary index.php files. Continuing to monitor sites with great tools like Google Webmaster Tools doesn’t hurt either.

  • Share/Bookmark

{ 4 comments }

Improving Your Clients' Google AdWords Quality Score

April 8, 2009

There are several factors Google considers when calculating an AdWords Quality Score. They include: The relevance of the landing page to the AdWords ad The click-through rate of the ad The time it takes for the landing page to load once the ad link is clicked My guest on About Home Business, web developer and [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article

Organic SEO Case Study

February 23, 2009

While I can’t reveal the client’s name, I recently shared the results of an organic SEO case study to show how organic SEO can boost website traffic. Here’s an excerpt of how an organic SEO campaign can boost site traffic: In the first month, all traffic increased by 5.12% but the number of visitors arriving [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article

META Keywords Tag DOES Matter to Yahoo!

February 4, 2009

The web design and development firm I was providing SEO subcontract services for decided to hide the META keywords tags. We discussed it before it happened – I had read from some notable SEO experts that in some cases, it is a “good idea to remove META keywords tags” so that competitors won’t get a leg up and target the same keywords for their own benefit. So the decision was made to remove the META keywords tags.

Not long after, the site completely dropped out of Yahoo’s rankings, with the exception of one targeted keyword phrase – the least competitive. After a while, the partner’s client began wondering aloud whey the site disappeared off of Yahoo’s radar and the partner came to me looking for advice.

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article

Web SEO PPC Overflow Can Get Your Agency Through a Busy Period

January 21, 2009

If you operate an SEO agency or other type of Internet marketing firm, you may occasionally find the need to outsource some of the tasks involved with your SEO or PPC projects. Most Internet marketers see a surge in business in the early part of the year as online businesses set their Internet marketing strategy [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article

Welcome to the SEO Searchlight Blog

January 2, 2009

By admin – Last updated: Saturday, November 8, 2008 Welcome! This blog is managed by SEO professional Randy Duermyer, owner of SEO Searchlight ( HelpDocuments.com). While our firm is based in New Hampshire, we provide professional SEO, web content and web hosting services for small and medium sized organizations on a virtual basis nationwide. SEO [...]

  • Share/Bookmark
Read the full article